
Swan.my.id - Global capital flight is keeping the rupiah vulnerable as foreign investors move funds toward assets they consider safer. Bank Indonesia Governor Destry Damayanti said the shift has contributed to capital outflows from emerging markets, including Indonesia.
The pressure extends beyond the currency market. Foreign investors have also sold Indonesian government securities, known as SBN, as well as Bank Indonesia’s SRBI instruments. The outflows have coincided with higher SBN yields and a narrower gap between Indonesian and US government bond yields.
Global capital flight brings pressure to the rupiah
Capital flight describes a substantial movement of funds out of one country and into another. Investors may withdraw money from a market and transfer it elsewhere when they view other assets or destinations as safer and more stable.
In remarks on CNBC Indonesia’s Central Banking program, Destry said global investors were seeking assets they considered relatively safe. She noted that investors holding dollars might regard the currency as a comparatively secure choice. As a result, emerging economies have seen capital outflows, with Indonesia among them.
That shift matters for the rupiah because foreign investment flows can affect demand for local financial assets and the currency. When investors pull funds out, the rupiah faces added pressure. Destry identified the global movement of capital as one reason the currency remained highly vulnerable.
Her comments describe a broader investor trend rather than an Indonesia-only development. Funds have been leaving emerging markets as investors reassess where they want to hold their money. Therefore, pressure on the rupiah sits within a wider pattern of capital moving toward assets perceived as safer.
Foreign selling reaches SBN and SRBI
The currency was not the only part of Indonesia’s financial market affected. Destry said foreign investors also recorded outflows from SBN, the government’s bonds, and from SRBI. Those withdrawals show how a change in investor preference can affect several domestic instruments at once.
SBN outflows became significant at one point, according to her account. When foreign holders sell government bonds, demand for those securities can weaken. In the period she described, the selling coincided with an increase in SBN yields.
Destry linked the bond outflows to global capital flight and the search for safer assets. Investors weighing where to place funds may compare returns and perceived safety across markets. In that setting, government bonds in emerging economies can face selling pressure when investors shift their attention elsewhere.
SRBI also experienced foreign outflows, she said. The simultaneous movement from SBN and SRBI matters because it shows that the withdrawals were not confined to one type of Indonesian financial instrument. However, Destry’s remarks did not specify the amount of outflows from either instrument.
Higher yields narrow the SBN-US Treasury spread
Destry cited rising yields in both the United States and Indonesia. She said US bond yields had climbed to 5.3%, while Indonesia’s 10-year bond yield stood at around 7.2% at the time of her remarks.
The difference between those yields, known as the spread, had narrowed, she explained. Although the Indonesian 10-year yield remained higher in the figures she cited, the increase in US yields reduced the gap between the two markets.
That narrowing formed part of the pressure facing emerging markets, according to Destry. As the yield advantage changes, investors may reconsider how they allocate funds between countries. In this case, she connected the smaller spread with outflows from emerging economies, including Indonesia.
Yield movements therefore provide another piece of context for the rupiah’s vulnerability. The currency, SBN and SRBI each reflect different parts of Indonesia’s financial market, yet all can be affected by shifts in international investor demand. The figures Destry shared show how movements in US yields can coincide with changing conditions for Indonesian bonds.
What the market developments indicate
Destry’s comments point to a chain of related developments: investors seek assets they view as safer, emerging markets experience capital outflows, and Indonesian instruments face selling pressure. The rupiah is exposed to that movement, while outflows from SBN and SRBI add strain in the bond market.
The narrowing yield spread offers additional context, but it does not by itself explain every currency or investment movement. Destry presented it alongside the rise in US Treasury yields and foreign selling in Indonesian securities. Together, those factors illustrate how global financial conditions can shape local market pressures.
For Indonesia, the episode highlights the sensitivity of emerging-market assets to international shifts in investor preferences. A stronger preference for dollar-linked or other relatively safe assets can redirect funds away from local markets. That movement, Destry said, has contributed to the rupiah’s vulnerability and to foreign outflows in government securities.
She made the remarks in an interview on CNBC Indonesia’s Central Banking program, cited on October 9, 2026. Her account ties the pressure on the rupiah and Indonesian bonds to a global search for safety, rather than treating the currency movement as an isolated event.